Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now
Philosophy of Life and Sex
 
My musings on the above title as well as anything else that crosses my mind.
Keywords | Title View | Refer to a Friend |
Pussy Worship
Posted:Dec 29, 2006 8:24 pm
Last Updated:May 7, 2013 11:23 pm
33074 Views

I posted this on ALT.COM a while ago, but thought this might be nice for many others to read..

**************************************************************************************************
To me going down on a woman is an act of worship because in many cases it initiates a mystic type of bliss state that many have associated with profound altered states of enlightenment.

I have found that everything associated with a woman's sexual orifice is most appealing to me. When I am close to it and can have my face right up against her, I can savor the scent, taste, and look up towards her face as I press my face up against her and kiss deeply.

Whether she shaves or is all natural, it is good. As a matter of fact, if she is all natural I always manage to get some hairs in my mouth, and I never spit them out. I always swallow them, for that is my gift, my reward. I would almost alway have at least a half to a dozen that I would gladly swallow. I would feel that if I get at least a dozen or so, I have done a good service.

If she has to go pee before hand, I enjoy that as well. I am not into water sports, but just the slight mist that is still there afterwords is actually a spicy flavor enhancer that causes my mouth to water, just thinking about it. Hmmmm!!

When I was at the gang bang party Sunday, I felt I had to kiss two women's pussies, for when I think of how divinely they can pleasure themselves and many suiters throughout the evening, then how could I not pay homage? For I was able to enjoy them both as well, and when no one was ready and they were waiting, I was there. I was there to worship them until they had fresh bulls ready.

When I am with someone one on one, than I want to start with foreplay which goes to much deep kissing,licking, nuzzling her delicious,luscious womanhood. For kissing in such a way as to communicate deep feelings of love, devotion, and surrender, to the divinity of the Yin principle in her, can deepen the sexual experience with a timeless, eternal, mystic bliss.

When sexual union does commence, I never feel that alone is long enough for her or I by itself, or when it is just me with her. But, before I would be finished, I would move back down from kissing the lips on her face, to her breast's,stomach, and, finally, back down...to Love itself. The delicious juice is stirred and smeared all over the vulva and the inside of the thighs, and is absolutely divine, I must lick it up and kiss her deeply inside.

Three or four times, perhaps more. Deep thrusting followed by deep kissing and more deep thrusting and kissing, moving from kissing the lips on her face to kissing the lips of her vulva. I just want it to last longer, and enjoy the scent, the taste, and to do all that is possible to help her pussy take her to other worldly ecstasy and bliss..
1 comment
We May Already be Immortal-Welcome to the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Posted:May 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Last Updated:May 13, 2012 7:42 pm
32324 Views

Although we may very well be on the verge of indefinite life spans for all on this Earth, there is an interesting theory that states that our world-line isn't the only one that exists, but might be one in an infinite, nearly identical
sub-infinity of what is termed the multi-verse. Because of this fact, although everyone you have known from childhood who was at that time over 80 years of age is no longer alive in this world, they may all be alive in others. Sounds
extremely far fetched? It has been stated that those who believe they understand quantum mechanics probably haven�t really thought it through. Well,let�s give it a shot here.

Every time there is an event that has an equal probability of happening,it can be said that our world line splits. If a coin is being tossed, in one reality it falls as heads, and in another it falls as tails. The world lines have to represent every possible event, not just the most probable.If you play the lottery, in which you have a 1 in 100,000,000 chance, than the world line splits 100,000,000 ways, so every possible combination of numbers is represented.
You win the lottery in one world and loose in the rest. Sounds daunting to say
the least, but Dr. Steven Hawkings goes much further.

The way the electron orbits a hydrogen atom ( it is the simplest) isn�t anything like the way the moon orbits the Earth. The electron doesn�t trace out an orbit in the way we like to think of it in the macro world, the electron creates a shell around the nucleus that is an electro-static force field. As a matter of fact, reality
as we know it depends on this property of physics. How this is interpreted is what is fascinating. The electron basically is at every possible position in the shell that is possible.
The wave property is said to represent nearly or perhaps and infinite number of electrons in coherence in this reality. Once the electron is disturbed, or ejected from the atom, it behaves like a single particle. This happens all over the known universe all the time. Hawkings has
interpreted this as the universe splicing off an unimaginable number of times into alternate timelines in which every possible position
of every particle in this universe is represented in the diverging time lines.

This is also observable with sub-atomic particles in the famous double slit experiment.
The setup is an electron gun, a barrier with two slits cut in it, and a target on the other side that can measure the electron. Fire one single electron at either slit and the electron converts
to a wave and go through both slits imultaneously and creates interference patterns on the other side. This has been more easily explained, as I understand it, by stating that
the electron splits into a myriad number of alternate space/time lines and navigates all possible paths from the electron gun to the target, therefore going through both slits an infinite number of times. The pattern
you see on the target, is where the electrons (from all realities) hit the target more and less than the mean statistical norm. All possibilities are represented. After the pattern appears, only one electron is present in our reality. All the others collapse into their individual realities and the alternaties
diverge never to have contact with each other again, at least not that we know of.

What could the above have to do with "immortality"? Remember, all possible outcomes, no matter how improbable are represented in alternity. Imagine that at age 20, there is a 5% probability that you could die. That translates to 1 in 20. In one reality, you could have died and in the other 19 you would have lived.

At age 50 or so, the probability is higher. Let�s say 1 in 10. In one world line, you are dead and in the other 9 you are alive.
Age 85, it might be 5 out of 8 world lines you are dead. But, you would only be aware of the world lines that you are alive in (barring a spirit, or maybe a spirit that operates across dimensional barriers in association with living bodies, all pure speculation, but who are we to say how the multi-verse is designed?).
So, is there some possibility that you could be alive when you reach 150 (assuming no breakthroughs in longevity beyond the normal)? We know of no individuals that we can verify that have. You would only be able to verify it to yourself.

As time goes on, the probability that you would die goes up dramatically. You or I might find a 98% probability of being dead at 105 years.
You or I would only be aware of the 2% probability of being alive. All other "realities" in which we are dead don�t matter to us.

As time goes on, the probability of death would be 1 trillion to 1 against being alive. If there is a slight probability of being alive, that would be a certainty in an infinity of realities.

In 1 reality out of a trillion would be the only reality that we�d be aware of. None of the others would be relevant. This would go on until only 1 in a google realities would we find ourselves alive in. The prospect would be that we would exist in only extremely improbable worlds in which we would be the only individuals seemingly immortal in a world populated by people who we would witness dying all around us after several centuries.

As we would continue to exist in realities that splice off from former ones, extremely improbable explanations would come to bear to explain our strange "fortune". Extremely rare anomalies of cosmic radiation mutating our DNA just right, an extremely improbable combination of unusual medicines, herbs, ext that reacted in just the right way with our metabolism.
As we would continue to die off in more "common" realities, our very existence that continues in the "fringe" realities would be extremely improbable, almost miraculous, or magical.

THE POSSIBLE DARK SIDE

As exciting as this may sound, what if the following scenario happened?

One is dying of cancer, and is in pain. There is a 99.97% probability that the person in question will die in the next month, therefore bringing final relief. There is a .03% that this would not happen, and following the logic of quantum immortality, the only worlds that one is conscious of are the more improbable ones that one still exists in.

Now, hopefully, in this scenario the only possible way to survive would be total remission. I would hate to think that one would survive indefinitely in pain, as one dies in all but 1 in a google or a googleplex worlds.
It would probably be impossible for a body to live indefinitely with an all consuming disease like either cancer, Alzheimer's or anything that is totally destructive. Unfortunately, the nature of quantum mechanics is that when a world splices off, it is (at least to known science) impossible to research the outcomes and verify the statistical possibilities of fringe outcomes.

TAKING CONTROL OF THE OUTCOMES.

Remember the lottery? Here is a thought experiment that would no doubt test ones faith in the many worlds theory of quantum physics. But if it is true, than winning the lottery would be just the beginning .

This would require the construction of a "quantum lottery machine".

Sounds like sci-fi, doesn't it?

It is fairly simple. you build a machine that connects to a computer that would be programmed to compare lottery results from a drawing to the numbers on your ticket that you buy for that drawing.

When the lottery is drawn and the results known, a comparison is made.

If your ticket dosn't match the winning numbers, than the computer releases a lethal gas into the chamber that you reside in.

If you win, you live.

You live in 1 in 100,000,000 realities, and die in all the rest. Provided the theory is valid. Remember, this is a thought expiriment and not encouraging any such recklesness.

This experiment isn�t one that a totally rational person with a reasonably good existence would care to do, for it is extremely high risk. If the theory of quantum mechanics in regards to the many worlds interpretation is flawed, than the outcome would be undesirable. We humans only know a little, and our ideas about nature have had to been revised though out history.
For me right now, at age 50 in good health with a job, home, and good companion, and living a good engaging lifestyle with varied interest�s in writing ( like now) composing music, surfing the net, going to the gym, and other interesting extra curricular activities (nudge nudge, say no more! Know what I mean?), than the experiment would be too risky. But here is a scenario in which it could make perfect sense.

It is the year 2040 and none of the really cool breakthroughs in life extension that many of us hoped for have happened. The likes of bio-Luddites such as Leon Kass and Francis Fukyuama have been successful at slowing down the progress of life extension, based on an extremely narrow view of what it means to be human, and that tampering with genetics would change that. So,I am 85 years of age, and have been privy only to enough new technology to make old age somewhat less frail and unpleasant than in the late 20th and earlier part of the 21st centuries. I am retired, play music at clubs for extra money and fun. But, life is getting harder (except, you know, sexual function would still be declining, so one thing isn�t getting as hard as often if you know what I mean) and the prospect of not being able to be fully independent is becoming more and more a real possibility. The mentalities of the dark ages are rearing their ugly, intellectually truncated, superstitious tendencies, are putting pressure to limit technology even more. Not much of a future at this point. Even though the theory of quantum immortality is popular, the way it can manifest itself in progressively older, infirm, improbable existence, isn�t anymore appealing than a natural death in a classical universe theory.

Why not put the theory to the ultimate test? The lottery has been a thought experiment up to now, in 2040 A.D., as far as anyone knows (might have been done in secret). It is a thought, an experiment that, at worse, would not prove anything and result in the death of a declining 85 year old in a declining civilization. At best, an 85 year old who emerges as a multi-million aire and with proof, at least for myself, that the theory is correct.

Or, am I just lucky.

Perhaps, now that I got my hundred or so million dollars (in 2006 constant dollars) I can try it again. If I win a lottery two times in a row, than I am almost certain that I am eliminating myself from undesirable realities and navigating to more desirable ones. Winning a lot of money is only the beginning of this.

So, I win the lottery twice. Now, I am world famous. I haven�t revealed my quantum lottery machine secret, and will not until I can accomplish some more interesting feats.
With my money, I can now take a small portion of my fortune and hire some bio-tech and nano-tech personal and pay them mega-bucks to develop some extremely improbable human enhancement technology. I say improbable because in the world I am describing, much of this type of technology is regulated because of popular support for neo-luddite thinking.

Now, I have my scientist working in South America, or the Far East, in the middle of the Pacific Ocean on some islands.
I instruct the scientists to take my DNA sample and develop some new age reversing, human enhancement therapies/engineering for me. To redesign me into what I want to be.
It is clearly understood that this would take years and I would die (at least in many of the worlds I was alive in) before any result�s could be achieved. Radical break throughs in a short time would prove to be extremely improbable.

I stated improbable, and as far as I would be concerned, no problem.

I put the scientist's to work, explaining what I want and that they are to try a variety of approaches, or put a variety of choices into a "lottery" of sorts, and choose randomly. Why not? More potential sub-groups of infinity to work out solutions.

I build a better version of my "lottery" machine and cut myself off from external realitie(s) so I can remain in an isolated Hilbert space (may want to google that one, can't go into that without 20 extra pages) unaware of how the reality chips are falling.

After my people work on ideas and potential applications for a limited time period, say 2 weeks, they send information from a computer on site (or one of the sites) to mine. The program is simple. They acknowledge success or failure. In, probably, most of a billion possible realities, they will acknowledge failure.
In one in a billion potential realities they will acknowledge success.

I will only live in the one in a billion. Still, an infinite number of realities.

Now, the first two problems have been eliminated through focused, conscious navigation through this new understanding of reality.
I am economically secure, and have brand new vigor. My "age" is now closer to 70 than 85. 70 in the year 2045, even after the envious malefactors have been successful at slowing progress, is still better than age 60 at the end of the last century.

I have had minimal effect on most of the realities, I just simply have collapsed my sense of self to more desirable realities.

Even now, this moment, realities are diverging and new ones are coming into being that are, mostly probable, and also some very improbable, perhaps, almost impossible by our understanding.
But, if the theory of quantum immortality is valid, than all of us will someday end up in extremely improbable realities, and perhaps, in a different interpretation, our own heavens and hells.

Now, in the more improbable realities I have partially engineered in 2040 A.D., I can give this wonderful technology and also the basic history of how I came to win the lottery two times, engineer improbable human life extension, and one more thing before I just rest for a while, to this group of realities.

The last thing to do for that time being is this. Hire some physicist's to work on a communication device that can do the following..
Maintain contact with all diverging realities from the time the first one is turned on.
The way this is done is just the same as before. Sorting probable outcomes. After that is accomplished, than civilization(s) in all (or most) of the diverging realities will maintain contact with each other.

In a reality where a father, mother, wife, husband, , any or all relatives have died (after activation) there would be others in which they would still be alive. An infinite number. And they would all be in contact with each other.

I would say that is a good start, for with an infinite number of people in an infinite number of civilizations, the speed of improvement would accelerate once again.

THE BEGINNING

The previous little thought expirement is the foundation of a little sci-fi story I am writing called "Hal Valdemont and the Quantum Lottery Machine" in which I chronicle the progression of this concept in an alternate world starting in the mid 1970's and how the diverging realities result in quantum computers in some realities in the 1980's, replicators and teleporters before the turn of the century.

That's it for for now.
0 Comments
Are Gang Bangs Good or Perversions? (Yes, this is very philosophic)
Posted:Aug 14, 2005 6:26 pm
Last Updated:May 7, 2013 11:24 pm
33348 Views

If the definition of perversion is anything that goes against nature, well the truth is that women having gang bangs is in actuality part of nature, so it can't be "perverted". After all, biology supports such activities, and the desire to do so exists as well. A species of primates called the Bonobo Chimpanzee, which is our closest genetic cousin, behave in a similar manner as the above. Females can mate with well over 50 to 100 males in a cycle.This behavior is considered patently "offensive" to some. But,the idea of what is perverted is a culturally subjective idea. Some of the older pre-civilized cultures had very different ideas of human sexuality than civilized societies of the last 5000 yrs. Much isn't known of these societies because they were either exterminated, enslaved, or "Christianized" by the more powerful empires that sweped the world. But I digress..

I would argue that our system of sexual mores are in reality malevolent and a true perversion of nature. The reason I say this is that so much of our "moral" tradition is about restraining and regulating sexuality-especially female sexuality! In a book by Daniel Amnius, which is a defense of our system, he actually has a chapter called "The Patriarchal System: Putting Sex to Work" the premise is that civilization is possible only by regulating female sexuality and "making men work for sex"(ugh!). Now, how any reasonable thinking normal man would think "Yeh this is good!" is almost beyond me. Of course, he states that restricting the ability of women to pursue their own economic interest and making them dependant on men is a major puzzle piece in the equation. So, in other words, our system is based on the premise that sex be regulated, and that the principle of scarcity be implemented, and that women, at least until recently , being economically dependant, essentially have to "sell" sex for security. I would call that a dual power pincer for human misery, and, even worse yet, has contributed to exponential population growth and the Earth of it's resources (nomadic human populations were stable for much of the last 100,000 yrs, with most of the growth since the emergence of civilization. I would recommend a book by William Kotkie called "The Final Empire", which is a wealth of information on this topic, and even touches on the subject of sexual mores in imperial societies. A very benevolent book, the exact opposite of books written by people like George Gilder, Daniel Amnius, Dr(?) Laura, Rush Limbaugh and the other clowns out there).
The above being reinforced by calling women who peruse sexual pleasure outside of marriage "whores" "sluts" while at the same time having few if any social sanctions against men who do the same, has the effect of re-enforcing the "scarcity" principle, and denying the natural desires of the women who would freely pursue gratification if it wasn't for , as I would state, our perverted, anti-nature, anti-human, malevolent system of sexual mores.

So, in conclusion, I'd say women pursuing their natural tendencies, whether to engineering "gang bangs" "group fucks" or what have you, can be powerful instigators to help hasten the collapse of our system of sexual mores which are clearly unnatural and perverse.

So, based on what I have written, what would you say? Good or Perverse?
3 Comments
Ladies, you can have it all! The numbers are in your favour.
Posted:Jul 25, 2005 12:52 pm
Last Updated:Jan 24, 2011 12:17 am
32473 Views

Most of you ladies are probably as pleasantly aware of the same fact that us men find to be a rather dismal reality. The number of men seeking women are about 10 to 12 times the number of women seeking men. What this means is that many of you ladies get dozens or so e-mails everyday! Your problem is "Gee! How do I sort through all this and who do I date!" That can be a rather daunting chore. Perhaps the problem is the old idea of a "date". A sorting out from 50 or so guys to find one or two for an evening. The prospect of a disappointment and a less than satisfying evening and the investment of time to hear endless self aggrandizing B.S. from some guy who wants to win you over all for himself(in which case, he should go to E-Harmony or one of those other places)... Here is an idea for some of you wonderful ladies to play with, those of you blessed with a much higher than average female sex drive (the ones I really love). Plan for yourself, on a Saturday or Sunday(assuming those are your days off) a "Power Date" day. Lets say, just for fun, you have gone through all your contacts and sorted them down to, oh, 20 or so. Lets say you start at 10 a.m. after breakfast and a shower, and your first date comes over for, 30 minutes. You could schedule one for every half-hour until 12:30 p.m. and give yourself a half-hour or an hour(or more or less depending on what you want) and start in again after a short rest(if that is what you want). This could go on until dinner time and start up again until you want to go to bed(perhaps alone or with an "overnight date"-up to you of course). In some cases, you may want a "double date", one for the front and the back at the same time. In other cases, seeing you have to overbook because some guys I've heard "flake out"(what the hell is up with that??) you might have 2 show up at the same time. Well, no problem, if they all know the score, one can wait for the other or, if you like, be part of a "double date". If what I've just described isn't as efficient as what you would desire, how about have 3 to 5 at a time over for 3 or 4 hour sessions? They would have to be willing to leave for your rest time or lunch time. Than you could have your next set of 3 or 5 come over after lunch, and, once again, because of the "flake out" scenario, you would have had to overbook, you might get 5 to 7 come over. Well, you ladies can think of some other scenarios for yourselves, and I for one would love to hear about them, or even better be invited!
1 comment
Let me introduce myself, alittle history
Posted:Jul 17, 2005 10:34 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
32133 Views

Yes, this is my first blog anywhere. I am young and new with this whole cyber thing and slowwwllly warming up to all this.

I first signed up here at Hotmatch/Adultfreindfinder because of the initial fascination with some of these little personal postings on the front page. I signed up for free-because I just had to see more! What with the young lady on the first page of women-seeking-men with some ones hand in her vagina and the caption "being slut trained"(I understand she is taking a break) I thought to myself "Well, this looks like fun-I gotta see more!", so I signed up for free. Not bad. Got an e-mail on my second week from someone who isn't here anymore, that just stated "are you free tonight". Unfortunatley, I work until 11 pm and by the time I could reply, she had all she needed(I am just speculating).
I have to admit that I, as of yet havn't done a whole lot, just warming up to things like posting comment on other blogs, advice lines, ect. I am just starting to sign into chat rooms, I have a little bit of learning to do on that one. It is easy to write at ones own easy pace, but I still find it alittle difficult following the message flashes in a chat room with 25 to 50 people. I also need to learn the little acronims and short hand. I think well on my choice subjects, but I am not lightning fast like a quantum computer when it comes to live interaction as of yet. Plus, I usually have 6 browsers open simutainiously looking a different things.

This is my first blog and also my first membership at any sex/swinging/horndog sight. I am starting to feel more at home here, and still looking for my first 1 on 1 / couple/group-gang bang expirience. But, just all the stories that I read here are circtainly good clean fun and entertainment.
0 Comments

To link to this blog (7inchlinguest) use [blog 7inchlinguest] in your messages.

  7inchlinguest 68M
68 M
December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
1
30
 
31