Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now

Member Deleted Post  

posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

qvillebiman 66M  
373 posts
3/18/2019 1:02 am

I do agree with you . I don't like people who just blog for points. I think that I am a puppy


dogslife2live01 71M

3/18/2019 3:02 am

well if they believe they are a rock... they can believe they are a straight rock that likes to get their rocks off in a gay mouth,,,
sometimes it is better not to understand the way some minds work

enjoy

there is a world of difference between insanity and stupidity


TheNotoriousFWB 42M

3/18/2019 3:39 am

This is the funniest rant I've read in a while. I saw that blog post listed, and I just scrolled right on bi.

In all seriousness, though, I couldn't agree with you more. If you are contemplating that, you are at least curious, so you can no longer call yourself straight.


HedonicHeathen 56M
198 posts
3/18/2019 4:31 am

Out of curiosity why is this important to you? What does this upset for you?

I ask because I truly do not understand ... the surface of it seems that you are upset because you want to push the notion that sexual orientation and gender are binary and polar in nature ... and that you assure the reader that you are cool if a person embraces and 'lives out' a choice of being one or the other, but not both. Is Bisexuality a no-no? Does the notion of sexual orientation being a spectrum you can dance across or dowse upon not serve you at all?

Not that I'm trying to convince you this is right or wrong or that it isn't either left nor rite, but consider that these labels of categorization of observable human behaviors may be limiting from a logical. mathematical, or geometric perspective.

Then I considered that it is the ambiguity that you are not liking. Either a person has to be category A or they are the other category of B and that this scheme or schematic serves a purpose in your life, if not just for making categories easy and therefore life remains apparently simple. But then I noticed that you did not seem upset at the person who posted this offer of acting the role of female, nor their presumed miss use of the term straight. Nope you placed the onus on the one who wants. If a guy wants to have oral from another guy then he isn't straight. Never that he is making due, or exploring. or wants both.

Well I can guarantee you there are not a bunch of straight guys sitting around going 'hey bro have you heard that by spelling sexual orientation alphanumerically - you can still call yourself straight when you another guy suck you dick. There might be, but ... if -as you say- " All that matters is you are a good person" and right is to be taken as meaning correct then - the the correct frame of responsibility would be on the one using the language in that manner: to deceive.

The overall vibe is that you are seeming to blame the victim (if being fooled into thinking a person who has a sexual orientation of heterosexual and socially as straight could maintain this label ... even though he behaves in a manner contrary to the labels indications). Ok so then I go onto think 'what purpose does this serve?' and the title of the post ... when read as an immanent, in the moment verbal statement ... comes off as an insult along the same lines as traffic conics (converse wedges flung), a tuna phish (believer in Internet shiney memes), or a rock (not even a veggie ... an insensate not knowing nor believing inanimate piece of dirt.

Now I've taken probably 100 times longer to write out this thought process, but I zipped through it in like 2 seconds. Because I know enough of the score to see the play as plain as day just by noticing who is to take the blame and who is out of the frame. You mention nothing about whether it is important for you to be good, nor what that even means except to indicate the misuse of terms might not be good.

So is there any room you leave for a straight guy to simply be whatever he wants to be if the one thing he is not supposed to be is aware, awake, and able? How is it that blaming the victim or encouraging the polarity and enforcing the binary dance ... to be taken as good, when the only way a person can make sense out of these contra-positions is by introducing other definitions. As such ... good is but a dog to walk and while everyone may pet his head and say 'whose a good boy?' but not ask 'how's a good boy?'

I digress ... the point I was trying to get at ... is if your position is to promote the notion that only correct definitions that are socially and culturally contextually shallow then you are setting up a person who is more innocent than good to take a fall. If I got this wrong - please explain. If you like.

And I agree going on about other people's blogs is a kind of jerk move. In that sense I'd even go so far as to assert that being creative is considered something more admirable than being good and so hence something that can trump morals ... at least as far as I've seen. I'd go a step further and say that a bigger jerk move is to then not have one's own blog in which to respond to said jerking off.

I know all this amounts to some idiot wind, Everybody hates Mondays and black souls ... I mean c'mon where does that saying even come from. Lunacy? well at any rate I appreciate a glove thrown down and directness ... but perhaps I'm getting that wrong to? I know I probably left too much out - you can even delete my post or whatever if you like. I just am having trouble seeing point due to all the angles.


ltrskr 75M

3/18/2019 5:25 am

Cinnamon, one rule to remember,

"Never argue with a fool, bystanders won't know the difference!"


scott0250 56M
511 posts
3/18/2019 5:36 am

Hi Cinnamon. If you had not notice, the guy you are talking about has been blogging about "straight" men liking and having sexual experiences with cd's, tv's/tg's/ts's. I replied to one of his earlier blogs saying that if a man has ever had a sexual encounter with a cd or tv/tg/ts he is either bi sexual or gay but is not "straight". He then deleted my post saying that I was offensive to all cd's and tv's/tg's/ts's. I do not know how my comment was offensive to any one but a guy who labels himself as "straight" wo has had a sexual experience with a cd, tv/tg/ts. ( Just to let you know, I label myself as bi sexual because I have had sexual encounters with a few ts's and have enjoyed it). I then posted again on his blog telling him he was an idiot. He then banned me from his blogs and magazine articles. Oh darn, I can no longer read his mis beliefs about "straight" men.


ltrskr 75M

3/18/2019 6:05 am

Mmmmm, Just read a couple more of his posting?????

I think he has just realized why his mothers nick name for him is:
"Glory Hole".........


mc_justmc 63M

3/18/2019 4:26 pm

That as sounds familiar, what was that old bloggers name?


GhostofH 65M
22788 posts
3/18/2019 6:08 pm

    Quoting HedonicHeathen:
    Out of curiosity why is this important to you? What does this upset for you?

    I ask because I truly do not understand ... the surface of it seems that you are upset because you want to push the notion that sexual orientation and gender are binary and polar in nature ... and that you assure the reader that you are cool if a person embraces and 'lives out' a choice of being one or the other, but not both. Is Bisexuality a no-no? Does the notion of sexual orientation being a spectrum you can dance across or dowse upon not serve you at all?

    Not that I'm trying to convince you this is right or wrong or that it isn't either left nor rite, but consider that these labels of categorization of observable human behaviors may be limiting from a logical. mathematical, or geometric perspective.

    Then I considered that it is the ambiguity that you are not liking. Either a person has to be category A or they are the other category of B and that this scheme or schematic serves a purpose in your life, if not just for making categories easy and therefore life remains apparently simple. But then I noticed that you did not seem upset at the person who posted this offer of acting the role of female, nor their presumed miss use of the term straight. Nope you placed the onus on the one who wants. If a guy wants to have oral from another guy then he isn't straight. Never that he is making due, or exploring. or wants both.

    Well I can guarantee you there are not a bunch of straight guys sitting around going 'hey bro have you heard that by spelling sexual orientation alphanumerically - you can still call yourself straight when you another guy suck you dick. There might be, but ... if -as you say- " All that matters is you are a good person" and right is to be taken as meaning correct then - the the correct frame of responsibility would be on the one using the language in that manner: to deceive.

    The overall vibe is that you are seeming to blame the victim (if being fooled into thinking a person who has a sexual orientation of heterosexual and socially as straight could maintain this label ... even though he behaves in a manner contrary to the labels indications). Ok so then I go onto think 'what purpose does this serve?' and the title of the post ... when read as an immanent, in the moment verbal statement ... comes off as an insult along the same lines as traffic conics (converse wedges flung), a tuna phish (believer in Internet shiney memes), or a rock (not even a veggie ... an insensate not knowing nor believing inanimate piece of dirt.

    Now I've taken probably 100 times longer to write out this thought process, but I zipped through it in like 2 seconds. Because I know enough of the score to see the play as plain as day just by noticing who is to take the blame and who is out of the frame. You mention nothing about whether it is important for you to be good, nor what that even means except to indicate the misuse of terms might not be good.

    So is there any room you leave for a straight guy to simply be whatever he wants to be if the one thing he is not supposed to be is aware, awake, and able? How is it that blaming the victim or encouraging the polarity and enforcing the binary dance ... to be taken as good, when the only way a person can make sense out of these contra-positions is by introducing other definitions. As such ... good is but a dog to walk and while everyone may pet his head and say 'whose a good boy?' but not ask 'how's a good boy?'

    I digress ... the point I was trying to get at ... is if your position is to promote the notion that only correct definitions that are socially and culturally contextually shallow then you are setting up a person who is more innocent than good to take a fall. If I got this wrong - please explain. If you like.

    And I agree going on about other people's blogs is a kind of jerk move. In that sense I'd even go so far as to assert that being creative is considered something more admirable than being good and so hence something that can trump morals ... at least as far as I've seen. I'd go a step further and say that a bigger jerk move is to then not have one's own blog in which to respond to said jerking off.

    I know all this amounts to some idiot wind, Everybody hates Mondays and black souls ... I mean c'mon where does that saying even come from. Lunacy? well at any rate I appreciate a glove thrown down and directness ... but perhaps I'm getting that wrong to? I know I probably left too much out - you can even delete my post or whatever if you like. I just am having trouble seeing point due to all the angles.
It's unfortunate that such a sincere, respectful, articulate, and intelligent comment doesn't get a response from the writer.....


positively4you 74F  
4605 posts
3/18/2019 8:08 pm

I have observed him. I think he is confused or uncomfortable with his sexual preferences. Like he needs some validation.


FMAOPLS 70F
27112 posts
3/19/2019 1:29 am

I've seen that lots of times, and it doesn't bother me.

Check out my profile or and become a "watcher" of my blog FMAOPLS,to learn more about me, and for intelligent, lively, smartassy and fun discussion, with a little irreverence thrown in. "Like" or comment on my photos, and I promise I'll add more. Thanks.


Become a member to create a blog